Winogradsky column lab page!


File:Icons-flag-uk.png
Welcome to the Winogradsky column lab page! Students from the Departments of Biological Applications and Technology, University of Ioannina and Icthyology and Aquatic Environment, University of Thessaly, Greece and the Microbiology course, Faculty of Sciences, University of Cádiz, Spain, discuss their findings on Winogradsky columns they constructed!

If you want to add a post, please feel free to contact the blog administrators (Hera Karayanni, Sokratis Papaspyrou or Kostas Kormas)!



Καλωσορίσατε στη σελίδα των Winobloggers! Διαδικτυακός τόπος συνάντησης φοιτητών, φοιτητριών και διδασκόντων δύο Τμημάτων από την Ελλάδα: Tμήμα Βιολογικών Εφαρμογών και Τεχνολογιών, Παν/μιο Ιωαννίνων και Τμήμα Γεωπονίας, Ιχθυολογίας και Υδάτινου Περιβάλλοντος, Παν/μιο Θεσσαλίας και ενός από την Ισπανία: Σχολή Θετικών Επιστημών, Πανεπιστήμιο του Cadiz. Παρακολουθούμε, σχολιάζουμε, ρωτάμε, απαντάμε σχετικά με τα πειράματά μας, τις στήλες Winogradsky!


Bienvenidos a la pagina web de los Winobloggers! Aquí los estudiantes y profesores de dos departamentos griegos, el Departamento de Aplicaciones y Tecnologías Biológicas de la Universidad de Ioannina y el Departmento de Agricultura, Ictiología y Sistemas Acuáticos de la Universidad de Thessalia, junto con los estudiantes de Microbiología de la Facultad de Ciencias en la Universidad de Cádiz, se reúnen para observar, comentar, preguntar y responder a preguntas relacionadas con nuestro experimento, la columna Winogradsky.


Winogradksy columns

Winogradksy columns
'In the field of observation, chance only favors the prepared mind' Pasteur 1854

Blog posts

Saturday, 1 April 2017

Winogradsky column





Winogradsky Column



Our group is formed by a group of students of biotechnology (Marta,Chiara and Juan) and we are so pleased to show you the development of our Winogradsky column along several weeks.

Raw materials.
-NaCl, as a source of salt (0.4g)
-Mug, like the habitat of the bacteria (20g)
-CaCO3,as a source of calcium, (0.46g)
-Na2SO4, it releases energy in water (0.42g)
-Paper, as a source of carbon (0.3g)
 -Yeast, it allows bacteria to do fermentation (0.41g)

Hypothesis:
- The paper is one of the most important elements in the increasing of the heterotrophic microorganism because it´s their one source of organic carbon. This kind of organisms can´t produce photosynthesis.
- The ion SO4- can be the source of aminoacids like cysteine or methionine. There are a kind of  chemoautotrophs organisms that use the energy of the oxidation reaction (the oxidation of the sulfur). They don´t need the oxygen to live.
- The yeast creates a culture medium rich in energy thanks to the process of fermentation.
- The mug is rich in ammonium salts, that are one of the main sources of nitrogen, a very important compound of aminoacids and nucleic acids. There are a kind of bacterias that fix the nitrogen of the soil, for example the Rhizobium.
We think that is very posible the growing of heterotrophic, Sulphurous, Nitrifyng, fermenters bacterias.


From the begining the whole column were black and we could not notice any difference in the organisation


First week.

In the first week we can see a different organisation, we can see tree parts;The brown one on the top of the column(with some air caused by fermentation),a black one in the middle and a grey one in the bottom.

Second week.

We notice that the black part has increased making a gap of air because of fermentation.The organisation remains equal and there is far more air in the whole column.
Third week

 In the third week the structure is the same as in the previous week, but we notice that some seaweeds have grown up on the top of the column,where is oxygen that is needed by it,because of CaCO3,and it is important to underline that in the middle of the column has appear SO4(2-) precipitated.

Saturday, 18 February 2017

UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA GREECE
BIOLOGICAL APLICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY

COURSE: AQUATIC MICROORGANISMS

Team 9: Katerina Mironaki
             Levidiotis Charalampos

Hello everyone!
       Inevitably our semester long project comes to an end. We tried to delay our entry in hopes of having clearer and more definitive results. So without further ado, these are some pictures of our columns about 17 weeks from the beginning of the experiment. 
       Thankfully the results followed our prior assumptions a discernable growth spurt of microbes in the second column much sooner than the first one as well a more intense coloration of the column. “        
       By comparing the two columns someone can easily observe the advanced growth state that characterizes the second one. From the intense coloration of the water to the early appearance of the colonies of purple sulfur bacteria the second column kept surprising us. Day after day, week after week new things started to make their appearance (new colonies of microbes formed speckles and strips, the sediment began enriching, the bottle swelling etc). Some of these new “findings” cowardly appeared in the first column but with a notable delay in time.
       In the end we can say that we are pleased with our results but we needed more time(a pity that semesters aren't longer...not really). Nevertheless we learned a lot of things and had quite some fun during these months.

       
 Everyone, thanks and good luck with your own projects!   




                                                          Column 1


                  

                           

                                                              Column 2





Saturday, 11 February 2017

Tzani Kalliopi
Mavridi Olga
University of Ioannina Greece
Biological Application & Technology

WEEK: 8th
Left: Winogradsky column with egg
Middle: Winogradsky column with garlic
Right: Winogradsky column with egg & garlic 

The hypothesis stated was confirmed; we observed differentiation between the three bottles in microorganisms’ development. Specifically, in the bottle with the egg as a sulfur source, we saw green sulfur bacteria characterized by a green/olive colored zone, and red-purple sulfur bacteria growing. We also saw the formation of biofilm. In the bottle with garlic as a sulfur source, we saw green sulfur bacteria and red-purple sulfur. However, we also observed the formation of FeS. Also, the water was easier to observe, since there was little to none biofilm, and we saw the growth of a plant. Finally, in the third bottle, which had both egg and garlic, we saw green sulfur bacteria, red-purple sulfur bacteria, and purple non-sulfur bacteria characterized by a red/ orange or rust colored zone. Again, in the water, there was no biofilm formation, and it had a high cyanobacterial growth.
Hello fellow winobloggers! We are Kalliopi Tzani & Olga Mavridi, under graduate students in the field of Biological Applications & Technology in the University of Ioannina. In terms of a class/ curriculum concerning aquatic microorganisms, we were assigned to make a Winogradsky column. For this purpose, we placed lake soil and lake water, from the Vrelis’s lake, into three bottles in a ratio 2:1. Each bottle contained lake soil and newspaper as source of cellulose. The bottles, however, contained different sources of Sulfur. In the first one, we added an egg, with its pod. The second one contained garlic & the third one contained both of these sources of sulfur (egg & garlic). Our bottles were closed, as to not exchange gasses like oxygen, with the environment, and they were placed in a sunny room. We observed them in a weekly base and we stated the following hypothesis: if there will be a differentiation between the 3 bottles concerning microorganisms’ development.
Vrelis's pond

Winogradsky column with egg & garlic (t=0)


Winogradsky column with garlic (t=0)



Winogradsky column with egg (t=0)

Sunday, 15 January 2017

MASMANIDOU MARIA
ZACHARIADI ISAVELLA
UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA GREECE
BIOLOGICAL APLICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY
AQUATIC MICROORGANISMS
WEEK: 2nd
LEFT: ¾ sediment-enrichment materials and lake water
RIGHT: ¼ sediment-enrichment materials, 2/4 sediment and lake water

On the left column, we observed that the aquatic phase got a dark green colour because of the growth of  green sulpur bacteria, such as chlorobium. Those microorganisms gain energy from light reactions and produce their cellular materials from CO2 in much the same way as plants do. However, there is one essential difference, they do not generate oxygen during photosynthesis because they do not use water as the reductant, instead, they use H2S. We also noticed a black line on the sediment’s surface which provides the existence of black sulphur-reducing bacteria such as clostridium and desulfovibrio. They use sulphate or other partly oxidised forms of sulphur as the terminal electron acceptor, generating large amounts of H2S by this process. The H2S react with any iron in the sediment, producing black ferrous sulphide. This is why lake sediments are frequently black. However, some of the H2S diffuses upwards into the water column, where it is utilised by other organisms (e.g green sulpur bacteria).
On the other hand, on the right column, we observed just a light green colour in the aquatic phase which could be a proof for the existence of Algae and Photosynthetic cyanobacteria(those microorganisms contains chlorophyll a and performs oxygenic photosynthesis).
From those indications we accepted the first hypothesis that microorganisms in the left bottle grew up faster than the right one.




WEEK: 3rd – 4rth
LEFT: ¾ sediment-enrichment materials and lake water
RIGHT: ¼ sediment-enrichment materials, 2/4 sediment and lake water

Our columns had no big difference between the 3rd and 4th week so we took just one photo.
The left turned purple  because of the growth of purple sulphur bacteria. These bacteria grow in anaerobic conditions, gaining their energy from light reactions but using organic acids as their carbon source for cellular synthesis. So they are termed photoheterotrophs. The organic acids that they use are the fermentation products of other anaerobic bacteria (e.g. Clostridium species). On the right one, aquatic phase turned dark green because of the green sulphur bacteria. No difference was observed in the sediment in both columns.






WEEK: 5th
LEFT: ¾ sediment-enrichment materials and lake water
RIGHT: ¼ sediment-enrichment materials, 2/4 sediment and lake water

Both of our columns got darker and so swelled that they could not remain in an upright position. When we tried to open them, bubbles started to emerge, which is a proof of the existence and the increase in the amount of methanogens. Except the methanogens, there might have been some other obligatory anaerobic bacteria at the bottom, such as Clostridium or Desulfovibrio. Then, Desulfovibrio respire using these compounds to reduce the sulfate from the eggs. These processes quickly deplete any remaining of O2 at the bottom of the column. Desulfovibrio release Hydrogen-Sulfide as a byproduct of said sulfate reduction. This causes a concentration gradient in the column between O2 and H2S (Higher O2 at top). On the left bottle, in the aquatic anaerobic phase, grew up both green and purple photosynthetic sulphur bacteria. On the other hand,the right bottle got a purple-red colour because of the sulphur or non sulphur  photosynthetic bacteria (such as Rhodomicrobium). These bacteria use the Ethanol which produced from the clostridium as a photosynthetic reducer.







WEEK: 6th
LEFT: ¾ sediment-enrichment materials and lake water
RIGHT: ¼ sediment-enrichment materials, 2/4 sediment and lake water


Six weeks later the column with the excess of enrichment materials (left one) got even darker in both sediment and aquatic phase. Microorganisms such as black sulphur-reducing  bacteria (in the sediment phase) and green sulphur bacteria (in the aquatic phase) continue growing up. In the right column, the aquatic phase got an orange-red colour because of the purple sulphur or non sulphur bacteria. Moreover, that colour could probably indicate cyanobacteria, who lost their chlorophylls and turned orange. No difference observed in the sediment phase in that column.







WEEK: 7th
LEFT: ¾ sediment-enrichment materials and lake water
RIGHT: ¼ sediment-enrichment materials, 2/4 sediment and lake water




The last week, in the sediment phase, in both of our columns developed some white bacteria ( basically colourless bacteria), which use sulphate as the terminal electron acceptor, generating large amounts of H2S by this process. Those microorganisms grow up in completely anaerobic conditions. Furthermore, both of our columns in aquatic phase turned green-orange because of the green and purple sulphur bacteria. Finally, in the left column,  grew up something like moss plants in the aquatic phase and biofilm in both columns.

Wednesday, 11 January 2017

Winogradsky’s Column

UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA GREECE
BIOLOGICAL APLICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY
AQUATIC MICROORGANISMS 

Team 7: Serasidis Konstantinos, Tsinoglou Makrina
Weeks: 5-7



During these three weeks there weren't observed any significant differences between the columns. However, between these weeks and the 4th week a main difference has been noticed in the Control column. The color of the water in the column appears to have green- brown color. In contrary with the 4th week the water had bright orange color. This difference is probably caused by the growth of cyanobacteria. Cyanoabcteria have oxygen-evolving photosynthesis like that of plants. Once the cyanobacteria start to grow they can oxygenate most of the water. So, the conditions in the water became aerobic and the purple non sulfur bacteria that need anaerobic conditions and are responsible for the orange color can’t grow anymore. That’s why the color in the water turned from orange to green after a few weeks.

The 7th week is the last week of Winogradsky’s columns growth. The experiment ended successfully and our hypothesis was confirmed. Our hypothesis was that in conditions that light is absence the growth of phototrophic bacteria will be absence too. The results have showed that clearly, as green and orange color that indicates the growth of phototrophic bacteria was present in the Control column and absence in column in the dark.

2.Column in the dark 

1. Control column  

Monday, 12 December 2016

STUDENTS:NENA KOUKOUGELI
                        DIMITRA-IOLI SKOUROLIAKOU
UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA GREECE
BIOLOGICAL APLICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY
AQUATIC MICROORGANISMS
WEEK: 7th
LEFT: warmth-exposed
RIGHT: control



   Warmth – exposed column                                          Control column

  

  Between the 6th and 7th week, we couldn’t descry any obvious difference.
  The growth of the purple sulfur bacteria in the middle zone is still more visible in the control column than in the warmth-exposed column. During photosynthesis, unlike cyanobacteria or plants, they bind sulfur from the bottom of the column producing hydrogen sulfide, rather than oxygen. Thus, the purple sulfur bacteria cause anoxic conditions in the middle zone they grow.
  In both columns, is still observed the presence of biofilms, the concentration of which, is greater in the first column.
  This gradual distinction in the zones of the column, starting with the display of sulphates purple bacteria, has only been observed in the control column, even after 7 weeks. Thus, it can be assumed that the growth rate of the bacteria in the 2nd column, is considerably slower, as zoning hasn’t been observed yet. This fact is probably due to the rapid fluctuation of temperature. In the warmth-exposed column, this affects the bacteria directly by limiting the growth of the non-resistant ones at high temperatures. Also, the bacteria in this column, in order to get protected from the temperature fluctuation, could form spores, which means a static metabolic condition. Rather than that, the overheating of the plastic bottle can excrete damaging chemicals for the bacteria.
  

Hypothesis: The rapid fluctuation of the temperature on daily basis, reduces the growth rate of the microorganisms in the 2nd Winogradsky column

Tuesday, 6 December 2016

UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA GREECE
BIOLOGICAL APLICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY

AQUATIC MICROORGANISMS 

Team 7: Serasidis Konstantinos, Tsinoglou Makrina
Week: 4

Fourth week’s observation: 18/11/2016

Between the previous weeks and this week’s observations several changes have been noticed in the Control column. Firstly, at the bottom of the column green color has been noticed. Specifically, these changes state the growth of green sulfur bacteria. These bacteria require anaerobic conditions, sulfide ions and light effect in order to photosynthesize. Also, at the bottom of the column are noticeable black spots that are caused by anaerobic sulfur-reducing bacteria. These bacteria use either sulfate or oxidized forms of sulfur as the terminal electron acceptor, generating large amounts of H2S. The H2S will react with any iron in the sediment, producing black ferrous sulfide. At a higher level of the column a brown color in the sediment shows the growth of heterotrophic bacteria. There is a green color band immediately above the sediment. The green colored band is caused by the diffusion of H2S from the sediment into the water column that enables anaerobic photosynthetic bacteria to grow. The orange color in the water of the column that is caused of purple non-sulfur bacteria seems to be the same as the previous week. Finally, biofilm is observed at the top of the water column. A biofilm is any group of microorganisms in which cells stick to each other and often these cells adhere to a surface.
At the bottom of the column in the dark, the sediment is observed darker in comparison with the previous week. The darker color of the sediment indicates the increasing growth of anaerobic bacteria. Also, black spots are noticed at the lower levels of the sediment that are caused by anaerobic sulfur-reducing bacteria. Additionally, the black band which formed at the upper levels of the sediment is caused by the growth anaerobic sulfur-reducing bacteria. The anaerobic conditions are formed by the diffusion of H2S from the sediment into the water column. Finally, biofilm is observed at the top of the water column.

2.Column in the dark 

1. Control column    

Sunday, 4 December 2016

STUDENTS:NENA KOUKOUGELI
                        DIMITRA-IOLI SKOUROLIAKOU
UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA GREECE
BIOLOGICAL APLICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY
AQUATIC MICROORGANISMS
WEEK: 6th
LEFT: control
RIGHT: warmth-exposed




The differences between the two columns are more obvious from the 5th to the 6th week.

In the first column, growth of urple sulfur bacteria in the middle zone is more odvious.

Purple sulfur bacteria are group of proteobacteria capable of photosynthesis and they are illuminated in anoxic zones. Unlike cyanobacteria or plants they do not use water as ther reducing agent, so they do not produce oxygen. Instead, they use hydrogen sulfide from the botom of the bottle which oxidised ti produse granule of elemental sulfure

In both columns, is still observed the presence of biofilms, the concentration of which, is greater in the first column

After 6 weeks, it has started a gradual distinction in the zones of the column, starting with the disply of sulphates purple bacteria. Considering that the forementioned zoning hasn't been yet observed in the 2nd column we can safely assume that it's groth rate is considerably slower. This happens probably due to the rapid fluctuation of temperature that affects the bacteria, not only directly by limiting the growth of the non-resistant, at high temperatures, bacteria, but also it affects them indirectly by the overheating of the plastic bottle that excretes damaging chamicals.

Hypothesis: The rapid fluctuation of the temperature on daily basis, reduces the growth rate of the microorganisms in the 2nd Winogradsky column

Thursday, 1 December 2016